c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
esc
cancel

Recent Updates RSS Hide threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Tom Lickona

    Feedback from the Field-Testing (part 3)

    Tom Lickona posted in Power2 Community at 10:36 am on March 2, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply

    Conditions for Success: Power2Teach

    Power2Teach was designed to involve the full faculty (not just those teaching Power2Learn) in  monthly, 90-minute Essential Conversations. Teachers discuss issues such as collegiality and student effort, examine relevant school data, and learn instructional tools.

    In the feedback on Power2Teach, some schools have said they want the program to be more closely correlated with the student Power2Learn curriculum, to give them the skills they need to teach that program well. (An online Power2Learn support program is being designed to do that.) Finding time for Power2Teach has also been an issue. Both the benefits and challenges of Power2Teach are reflected in one principal’s comments:

    To strengthen the connection between Power2Teach and Power2Learn, we post the weekly student Power2Learn lesson right above the copy machine for all faculty to see. At the beginning of each Power2Teach session, we also present an abridged Power2Learn lesson and video clip so the faculty can experience what the students are experiencing. This is powerful-our teachers say they really appreciate it.

    She concluded: “Our biggest challenge has been keeping Power2Teach a priority when faculty time is so limited for discussing curriculum matters, scheduling issues, and needs of our students and parents that arise throughout the year. Despite this, Power2Teach has helped us implement our core values and improve our school culture.”

    In response to school feedback about time constraints, Power2Teach has been redesigned as Power2Teach Toolkits, independent professional development modules from which schools can choose according to their needs and available time.

    From the forthcoming Winter/Spring 2010 issue of Excellence & Ethics (to be published 3/10/10).

    • Share/Bookmark
     
  • Tom Lickona

    Feedback from the Field-Testing (part 2)

    Tom Lickona posted in Power2 Community at 11:24 am on March 1, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply

    Conditions for Success: Power2Learn

    1. TEACHER LEADERSHIP. Students say they prefer it when teachers actively teach a Power2Learn lesson by asking questions and explaining the ideas; sharing personal stories and inviting students to share their experiences; and muting the PowerPoint voice-over for some or all of the lesson. One teacher said:

    My Power2Learn class participated really well today because I did more to direct their activities and facilitate the discussion.

    2. CHOICE OF VENUE. Context matters. In schools where advisory period is now used for Power2Learn, some students have objected to losing what was a time for talking with friends. They’ve also asked, “Why do we have to do work when we’re not getting any credit?” Other schools have solved the credit problem by teaching Power2Learn within a regular academic course (e.g., freshman English) or within the school’s for-credit seminar class.

    3. EXPLAINING THE PROGRAM’S PURPOSE. Students find it helpful when teachers take time to explain how Power2Learn will help them. One girl said:
    “Throughout a lesson, our teacher talks about how these ideas will help us in school and in life and how they’re still relevant to her as an adult-because all through life you have to manage your time and deal with stress.”

    4. ACTIVE LEARNING. Some teachers have devised strategies for increasing students’ active involvement. One teacher, after his class watched a clip from the movie “Drumline,” made a masking tape “continuum” on the floor and told his students:

    I want you to stand on the point that represents your opinion. This end of the continuum is VERY FAIR; the other end is ABSOLUTELY UNFAIR. My first question: “Was the band leader’s decision to discipline the whole band because of the actions of some, fair or unfair?” Okay-now move.

    “Even my stick-in-the-mud students had to get involved,” this teacher said.

    5. EFFECTIVE DISCUSSIONS. How much students get out of any lesson depends to a considerable extent on what the teacher does to draw out the learnings and help students apply them in other contexts. One teacher describes how, after a Power2Learn tower-building activity, she guided a class discussion to help students generalize their learnings:

    At the beginning of the activity, students complained about the building constraints imposed by the instructions. In our discussion, I asked them for examples from life where they put more energy into complaining about a problem than into coming up with a solution. I challenged them to use what they learned from this to better focus their energies in my regular classes. That’s the real benefit of these lessons-developing a common vocabulary and set of understandings that can be transferred.

    6. A CLASSROOM COMMUNITY THAT SUPPORTS AND CHALLENGES. To help build a community that supports and challenges, each Power2Learn class had to create a Compact for Excellence-rules for best work and respectful behavior.  However, whether the Compact really influences behavior depends on what the teacher does with it. Many students said their Compact was just “words on the wall.”  Said one girl: ” We never talk about it. We’ve got kids in our class who call other people ’stupid.’” But in other classes, the Compact was a living document because of the teacher:

    Our class really got involved in discussing how we treat each other. Our teacher sometimes reviews our Compact at the start of class and points to it when somebody isn’t following it.

    7. GREATER ACCOUNTABILITY FOR APPLICATION. Students said they are learning practical tools like goal-setting and time and stress management but need reminders from their teachers to use them (“Let’s hear how you’re doing with the time management plan you made last week”). One boy commented:

    It feels like we’re writing all these goals and things we should do, but then you walk out of class and forget about it. If we kept coming back to them in later lessons, it would help us use them more.

    Students also felt they should take with them something from their Power2Learn folders (now collected at the end of class) that would remind them of their goals. Finally, they proposed having a “goal partner” because “you wouldn’t want to let yourself or that person down.” One school did this by creating “accountability buddies,” as a girl explained:

    I’m Andrea’s accountability buddy. Her goal is to not get any referrals. Sometimes in class I’ll whisper, “Andrea, you’re about to get a referral . . . ”

    • Share/Bookmark
     
  • Tom Lickona

    Feedback From the Field-Testing (part 1)

    Tom Lickona posted in Power2 Community at 1:08 pm on February 28, 2010 | 0 Permalink | Reply

    Kate Erickson bantered with students in her multicultural freshman communications class in Junction City High School, Kansas, then settled them down with a community-building ritual, their class handshake.

    When the buzz from that activity subsided, she said, “Okay, guys, today we’re continuing with our Power2Learn unit on managing stress. We’ve all got stress in our lives, right? One of the stressors in my life right now is a graduate course. My final exam is tonight!

    “Today’s lesson focuses on ‘turn-around’ stories-responding to stress by changing the direction of your life. We’re going to look at a video showing one young woman’s turn-around story, but first I’d like to ask Marcus [name changed here] if he’d be willing to share his story.  Marcus is one of the most mild-mannered students I know.” (Later she told us she knew he’d be willing to tell his story because he had done so in another class.)

    With all eyes on him, Marcus, about 6′ 4″ and 250 muscular pounds, spoke softly:

    “When I was younger, I was part of a gang. We beat up some boys pretty bad and put them in the hospital. I went to jail, a juvenile detention center, for 13 months.”

    “What did that teach you?” Mrs. Erickson asked.

    “To control my anger.”

    Erickson asked the class, “Marcus is an example of what?”

    “A turn-around story,” a boy said.

    It was a moving moment.  The stage was set for the rest of the lesson.

    She then showed a You-Tube video, “Homeless to Harvard.” In that story, college student Liz Murray tells how she grew up with parents who were drug addicts, lost her mother to AIDS at age 15, and soon found herself living on the streets wondering, “Am I going to end up like my mother or do something different with my life?” She decided to go back to high school and persevere no matter what-and ended up getting accepted into Harvard University.  Students in Power2Learn classes say they find videos like these “inspirational.” One boy said:

    “Homeless to Harvard” showed someone who didn’t seem to have a future but worked really hard to get to where she wanted to be. If she could get into a good college in spite of all her problems, then with all the support I have from my parents, I should be able to do it, no problem.

    Program Feedback on Power2Learn and Power2Teach

    We were in Kansas, Iowa, and New Jersey observing Kate Erickson and other teachers to gather feedback on the field-testing of two new programs that are the leading edge of our Smart & Good Schools Initiative: Power2Learn for students and Power2Teach for faculty.

    Power2Learn is a high school curriculum (7 units, four lessons each) designed to develop academic and social competencies within a classroom and school culture of excellence and ethics.  It can be implemented in one grade level (e.g., 9 grade or, if a school prefers, grade 8), or in heterogeneously-grouped classes.

    Lessons are structured to be teacher-taught with the aid of a teacher script and multi-media slides and, in version 2.0 of the program, will include greater use of authentic assessment approaches and some form of accountability/acknowledgment for the work accomplished.

    Based on the conceptual framework presented in our 2005 Smart & Good High Schools report (www.cortland.edu/character), Power2Learn seeks to help students acquire:

    • performance character competencies such as work ethic, organization, and perseverance and moral character competencies such as honesty, respect, and justice;
    • practical tools (life map, effort and attitude rubric, integrity-in-action checklist, etc.) that help students actually use their performance and moral competencies in their academic classes and other areas of their lives.

    Power2Teach is a companion professional development program for a school’s full faculty aimed at developing a strong Professional Ethical Learning Community that supports Power2Learn.

    What Are the Conditions for Success?

    As part of the field-testing, we’ve observed lessons being taught, conducted student and faculty focus groups on Power2Learn and Power2Teach, and solicited anonymous online lesson critiques from teachers and students. Our goal: to identify “conditions for success,” factors that significantly influence program effectiveness, including:

    • programmatic features: design features of the lessons we provide, teacher training to prepare faculty to teach them, and guidance from us while they are teaching them;
    • implementation approaches:  strategies teachers and schools have used to maximize success of the programs.

    Feedback from schools is helping our design team strengthen the programmatic features as we create version 2.0 of Power2Learn and Power2Teach.  The next installment of this post will share some of the implementation approaches that pilot schools have used to enhance effectiveness.

    • Share/Bookmark
     
  • Matt Davidson

    Developing Character & Culture In Iowa

    Matt Davidson posted in IEE & Partners' News at 12:03 pm on December 18, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply

    Earlier this week I traveled to Des Moines, Iowa to meet with our Regional Center partners, the Institute for Character Development at Drake University.  On Tuesday we went to meet with representatives from the Department of Education.  It’s a busy time of year; and this year things are even busier given the economic realities (the Department of Education, along with the rest of Iowa has been implementing a mid-year 10% across the board budget cut).  So we were especially grateful for the meeting.

    Over the past several years we have continued to meet with representatives from the Iowa Department of Education as part of our ongoing efforts to (1) understand the pressing challenges and initiatives faced by educators in Iowa (including the Iowa Core Curriculum, the 21st C Skills, Response to Intervention, Work Force Preparation, Dropout Prevention, etc.), and to (2) keep the Department updated on our programs, training, and research and how it aligns with and assists educators in realizing the goals of these pressing initiatives and challenges.

    I won’t lie, many meetings of this type can be pretty depressing: you have the sense that they’re yesing you so you’ll get the heck out of their office. And, in fairness to them, most folks that are bringing something to them are concerned with their agenda, not helping the department officials solve their concerns.  What was so refreshing about our meeting with the Iowa Department of Education was that there was genuine interest by all to be updated on the efforts to pilot programming whose success impacted all around the table.

    I think it was refreshing for the Department of Education to be updated on the 4 Iowa Field Research Sites participating in our Power2 programming (including hearing directly from an Associate Principal from one field site). I think it was encouraging for them to hear a “warts and all” assessment of our efforts.  We weren’t there to sell them that we have it all figured out (these are difficult challenges; if it was easy it would already be solved).

    The programs aren’t perfect; there have been growing pains (for the schools and for our team), but that we also have some important points of growth.  We have students working on an entirely new approach to character education:  one that helps them to intentionally develop the culture and competencies of excellence and ethics needed for school, work, and beyond.   The programming isn’t soft, ice-breakers and brain candy.  Students are thinking, and writing, and sharing, and experiencing an approach that is intensive and intentional (and we have emerging evidence that the programs are having an impact). Teachers are experiencing programming that has them learning, thinking, reflecting on data, and engaging colleagues in dialogue–all around character and culture needed for teaching and learning. Power2Teach has been very well received and the schools have put in significant time and energy.  The more we are able to help teachers understand this as not competing with the Iowa Core Curriculum, but as a pathway for realizing the Core Curriculum, the more progress we will make.  

    I think it was important to the Department to know that work continued this year in 4 field sites in spite of the fact that our proposal for funding was not reviewed by the USDOE Partnerships in Character Program (since funding was cut in the omnibus budget last spring, our proposal to do Power2Programming with 44 Iowa High Schools wasn’t reviewed).  So, in a difficult economic year, with pressing educational initiatives all around, 4 field research sites in Iowa commited their time and energy, supported by funding from secured by IEE and it’s partners at ICD and the Center for the 4th and 5th Rs. It was truly an example of “shared risk, shared reward” by all involved.

    We were grateful that at every step the Department has listened; the Department has continued to observe our work; the Department has continued to challenge us to align our research instruments and programming with the key initiatives in Iowa (like the Core Curriculum).  They haven’t promissed us anything, except that they would continue to listen, observe the ongoing field research work, and to continue dialogue about how the Power2Programming might help Iowa’s educators meet the Department’s vision.

    It’s slow, difficult, painstaking work. But, strangely, in a pretty depressing year, all around the table I believe were encouraged–maybe becuase we were talking about real work, done with real schools in Iowa, that was focused on meeting the needs of real students and teachers.  Funny how most of our time seems to be spent on other things that don’t really matter. 

    There are still many challenges and there were absolutely no clear answers.  Just a heartfelt sense of appreciation by all gathered for the hard work done by all to develop research-based  solutions to the challenges facing schools in Iowa–that are both useful and feasible.

    We were grateful for the time; encouraged by the progress; and, recommitted in our collective efforts to work harder to build on the successes of this past year, with hopes that 2010-2011 might see all involved in this important work, returning to the table with even more to celebrate. 

    Consider me a hopeful realist. What’s that mean?  I assume it will be harder than we think, require more time and effort than we planned, but that given the commitment and dedication of our partners, I expect for us to make some major headway on our shared challenges  in this coming year.

    • Share/Bookmark
     
  • Tom Lickona

    National Liberty Museum's Heroes of Character

    Tom Lickona posted in Character Blog, Power2 Community at 10:20 am on December 11, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply

    This past Tuesday, December 8, I had the opportunity to be one of the
    speakers at the National Liberty Museum’s launch of its Heroes of
    Character project in Philadelphia. The project includes four interactive,
    character-centered exhibits at the Museum and a website
    (http://www.heroesofcharacter.org)  featuring character education activities and
    resources for teachers, families, and communities-all designed to
    challenge kids to become a “hero of character” by making good choices,
    developing their talents, using their gifts to serve others, and the like.
    Tuesday’s launch event included a splendid speech on liberty and character
    exemplars by Dr. Jack Templeton, president of the John Templeton
    Foundation, which funded the Heroes of Character project. (Jack said he’d
    send me a copy of his talk.)

    In my 15-minute talk at the luncheon, I was able to include a brief
    account  of our current field-testing of Power2Learn in four states, with
    an example of a lesson we had just observed at Junction City High School,
    a large, multicultural school (about 50% African-American) and one of our
    leader schools in Kansas. Junction City is implementing Power2Learn with
    freshmen, having faculty teams (who teach Communications, Math, Science,
    and English) take turns teaching the lessons of a given unit.

    The day Sue Kidd (coordinator of the Kansas federal character ed grant)and
    I visited, we were able to observe Communications teacher Kate Erickson
    (also her school’s  Internal Power2 Coach) do a wonderful job of teaching
    the lesson from Unit 2 (on stress management) that includes the inspiring
    You-Tube clip, “Homeless to Harvard.”

    If you haven’t seen that You-Tube, it tells the story of a young woman
    named Liz Murray. She recounts how she grew up in a dysfunctional family
    with parents whose idea of life was having a good time dancing and doing
    drugs. When Liz was 15, her mother contracted AIDs, and died within a
    year. Liz found herself on the street and wondering, “Am I going to end up
    like my mother, or am I going to do something different with my life?”
    She decides to work hard in school, believe in herself, and persevere no
    matter what-and gets accepted into Harvard.

    Before teacher Erickson showed the video and had the students discuss the
    suggested questions (“What do you admire about Liz Murray?” “What
    questions would you like to ask her?”), she explained that the clip was an
    illustration of how we can turn our lives around if we want to. The most
    moving moment of the lesson came next when she asked **Jason, a tall
    African-American boy (about 6′ 4″, 240 lbs.)in the back of the room, if he
    would be willing to share his story. (Later she told us she knew he
    wouldn’t be embarrassed to do so because he had done so in another class.)
    She added, addressing the class: “Jason is one of the gentlest, most
    mild-mannered, and polite people I know.”

    Speaking softly, with all eyes on him, Jason then told his story:

    “When I was younger, I was part of a gang. We beat up some boys pretty bad
    and put them in the hospital. I went to jail, a juvenile detention center,
    for 13 months.”

    “What did that teach you?” Mrs. Erickson asked.

    “To control my anger.”

    “Jason is an example of what?” Mrs. Erickson asked the class.

    “A turnaround story,” a boy said.

    It was a powerful moment.  Many teachers have brought a Power2Learn lesson
    to life by sharing a story from their own lives.  Kate Erickson
    demonstrated the power of eliciting a pertinent story from a student’s
    life. This was one of many things she did to make this lesson a memorable
    one for her kids. It was a pleasure for Sue and me to see the potential of
    a Power2Learn lesson in the hands of a passionate and talented teacher.

    And I was grateful to be able to share this story with the folks at
    National Liberty Museum’s Heroes of Character event.

    ***Note: name changed

    • Share/Bookmark
     
  • Kathleen Davidson

    Then Someone Else Is

    Kathleen Davidson posted in Character Blog at 10:28 pm on December 10, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply

    Unfortunately, as disappointing and demoralizing as it is to say– bullying is not a novel subject for schools throughout the country.  It is not late-breaking news that schools everywhere deal with this.  To the contrary, it has proven to be a persistent problem even in the face of efforts to bring the issue to light and create formal programs specifically designed to go after the causes and solutions.

    This story on CNN details yet another case where multiple students planned, encouraged, and executed an act of violence on another student over a seemingly insignificant issue.  Not to mention, as is typical of these cases, this was not the first incident, but rather the culmination of numerous other instances of physical, emotional, and verbal abuse in school.

    While the story itself is indeed upsetting, it was as I found myself at the bottom of the article and I read on to the comments that other readers had left that I found the real sadness.   I don’t often read those comments, but in this particular story I was struck that many reactions to the piece included statements like: “I see this everyday” or “this permeates the school experience.”  For me it drove home, yet again, the importance of not letting the culture of our schools be shaped by chance, good intentions, or accident.  Character education at its best has evolved, and is not an anti-bullying approach. It looks at schools as a more holistic system with a culture that has the potential to influence staff, students, and community—for good or for bad.

    Still, when the general consensus at the end of a news piece that reports a group of students verbally and physically assaulting another is “this is the way schools are”  we must ask ourselves—who determines “the way schools are”?

    And then we must face the fact that whether we want to call ourselves “character educators” or not,  if we aren’t explicitly and intentionally determining “they way our school is”—then someone else is.

    • Share/Bookmark
     
  • Matt Davidson

    Matt Davidson posted in Character Blog at 6:24 pm on December 8, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply

    I was recently interviewed by Joe Drape of the NY Times for a story he was writing about the Smith Center football team, whose streak of 79 consecutive victories came to an end in an overtime loss in the class 2-1a championship game. In the article Joe is trying to drill down on where winning streaks come from.  Joe asserts at one point that it’s partially about talent, chemistry, and luck, which isn’t innacurate. And yet, those seem insufficient for explaining how you explain 79 consecutive victories.  (In fairness to Joe, he delves in greater depth in his book “Our Boys” into coach Barta’s approach, and the influence of the entire Smith Center culture. It’s a fantastic read.)

    What Joe is going after in this piece is at the core of what we’re trying to not only understand, but positively impact in our Power2Progamming. We’re trying to develop the culture and character of excellence and ethics for success in school, work, and beyond. We look to examples of excellence over time, to distill down the replicable elements for use by parents, teachers, coaches and business leaders.

    So where do winning streaks come from?  First, as I indicated in the article, they come from leadership.  But, just like was profiled in “Good to Great” these aren’t necessarily your rock star leaders who overwhelm their teams with charisma.   The leaders are committed to shaping a culture of excellence.  What we say is: “we shape the culture, the culture shapes the character.”  

    What shapes culture? Signature practices or ways of doing business.  It’s your rituals, your routines, your explicit focus on developing the character NEEDED FOR the system you want to run. What’s that mean?  If you to run a disciplined offense, based on personal and collective responsibility; if you need honest and constructive critique; if you need humility and continuous improvement; then, you must shape routines and rituals that build those character muscles. 

    So, winning streaks come from strong culture.  Leaders have a vision of the culture needed for their philosophy and practical approach.  Leaders shape rituals and routines–signature practices that define who we are and how we do business.  In and through the consistent and faithful experience of those practices, over time, individuals begin to take on the distinguishing mark (in Greek, character) of that culture.   What kind of character is needed? Performance character (qualities needed for excellence–perseverance, work ethic, positive attitude,) and moral character (trust, respect, honesty, humility, love, committment). 

    When you have a culture, a shared way of doing business that is like water to fish–you don’t know any different way of being and being this way seems essential to who you are and how you live–then the depth of impact on individuals is extraordinary.  The culture then becomes an even more powerful shaper of the inviduals than the leader (the leader still matters in that they have created and hold the group to faith implementation of the routines, but the individuals come to believe in the routines and “the group way” with unwavering faith.  That’s why they say, “good coaching is what your team would do in the last three minutes if the coach wasn’t there.”

    Talent, chemistry, and luck aren’t unimportant in understanding success.  But its really focus on shaping the culture, to shape the performance and moral character NEEDED for success.  Because character and culture are what develop talent and chemistry. Luck?  Well, we all need it, but how to get it is a different post.

    • Share/Bookmark
     
  • Kyle Baker

    Power2 School Highlighted for Service Learning Initiatives

    Kyle Baker posted in IEE & Partners' News at 1:59 pm on December 4, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply

    Cherry Hill Alternative High School, a Power2 high school in Cherry Hill, New Jersey continues to receive recognition for their student-driven service-learning initiatives.  For the second consecutive week,  the Cherry Hill Public Schools E-news offered a description of what students, faculty, and staff at the school are doing to engage in the greater community.  The following is a quote from the December 4th edition:

    “As the season of giving approached, staff, students, and friends of the Cherry Hill Alternative High School, once again, elected to sponsor Heifer International, an international nonprofit organization whose goals include ending world poverty and eliminating world hunger. This year’s Alternative High School campaign culminated with the purchase of a llama for a family located in the Andes Mountains of South America, a flock of chicks to a village in South America, and a flock of ducks to a village in Asia. The llama allows families to earn a modest income from selling the wool, or making clothes or blankets. The eggs that are harvested from Heifer International’s Poultry Project provide a sustainable food source to malnourished children.”

    The students, faculty, and staff at Cherry Hill Alternative High School spent time during the month of November developing a community food drive, which included delivering empty bags to residences in their neighborhood and collecting them later to gather community donations.  Students also engaged in a day of direct service at organizations within the community.  Just before the Thanksgiving holiday, the school gathered together in celebration of their good works with a community meal.

    The faculty, staff, and administration at Cherry Hill Alternative School have shown great commitment and dedication to developing the culture and competencies of excellence and ethics within their school through the Power2Learn program, service-learning initiatives, and the development of a dynamic school community.

    • Share/Bookmark
     
  • Vlad Khmelkov

    Fall 2009 EE newsletter is out

    Vlad Khmelkov posted in IEE & Partners' News at 5:01 pm on December 1, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply

    For those who missed the Fall 2009 excellence & ethics newsletter, I posted a link to it on our site. You can also go to it directly:

    http://www.cortland.edu/character/newsletters/EE_LETTER_Fall2009_final.pdf

    As always, great job, Tom and Marthe!

    • Share/Bookmark
     
  • Kyle Baker

    "What Makes Innovators Different?"

    Kyle Baker posted in Power2 Community at 3:19 pm on November 30, 2009 | 0 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Innovation, Instrucation, Strategy

    The headline on the cover of this month’s Harvard Business Review (HBR) reads “Spotlight on Innovation.”  While HBR presents primarily within the context of entrepreneurship and management, increasingly we are learning as educators that what drives success in other fields also drives success in the areas of teaching and learning.

    “The Innovator’s DNA” by Jeffery H. Dyer, Hal B. Gregersen, and Clayton M. Christensen, provides a perfect example of where successful business strategies cross over into education.  After spending six years studying some of the most innovative minds in the business world including people like Jeff Bezos, Niklas Zennstrom, and Pierre Omidyar (imagine life today without Amazon, Skype, or eBay) the authors identified 5 “Discovery Skills,” that drive innovation:

    1. Associating
    2. Questioning
    3. Observing
    4. Experimenting
    5. Networking

    When I look back on my own teaching career, I can see how these five skills were present when my teaching and my students’ learning were at their most effective points.

    To deliver dynamic and meaningful lessons we as educators strive to [1] make associations using real life examples that drive critical thinking and aren’t always within the walls of our classroom (or content area); [2]we ask ourselves questions during instructional planning such as “If my students asked me why learning how to find the square root of a number matters, how would I respond?”; [3]we observe things like students’ interests and their energy level in class to inform our instructional and classroom motivation methods (i.e. SPURS jumping jacks for my students in San Antonio when energy was low); [4]we are unafraid to try bold new instructional techniques with the understanding that while we might miss on some, we’ve got to take some shots to make a basket; [5]we don’t close our door and hole up inside our classrooms, but rather we seek out and share ideas with other educators in our building and through workshops, continuing education, and professional organizations.

    Even if you don’t feel like you’re an “innovator,” the authors provide some excellent examples of simple things you can do to strengthen your Discovery Skills.  For example:

    “Try spending 15 to 30 minutes each day writing down questions that challenge the status quo in your company.”  (Here we can easily substitute classroom, school, or instructional practices for company)

    While spending a hundred dollars on a subscription to HBR might not be in all of our budgets, a trip to the local public library with a mug of coffee or tea, a legal pad to take some notes, and a reflective spirit might just give you the boost you need to push your innovation skills to the next level whether you’re in a school, at work, or beyond.

    Reference:  Dyer, Gregerson, Christensen.  (2009, December).  The Innovator’s DNA.  Harvard Business Review, 87(12), 61-67

    • Share/Bookmark